Ever since the early part of the last century, our Constitution has gone through many changes.  Judges on Supreme Courts throughout the nation and in the nation's capital have taken it upon themselves to determine what the Constitution "really" means.  Under the new edited version, people don't really have a right to private property, because any local municipality can confiscate that property at any time and sell it to the highest bidder who will then demolish it, along with several other houses in the neighborhood, and turn the entire area into a shopping mall or hotel or casino, etc.

Late last week, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that foreign fighters who are not from Iraq, and who have never stepped foot in the United States, who's only connection to our country is that they are trying to destroy it, are protected by our constitution, and have the right to a public trial.  This idea is so asinine as to be completely laughable, if not for the fact that the Supreme Court ruled in their favor! 

On the one hand, we have liberals claiming that trying to export our way of life to other cultures is a bad idea.  Yet on the other, they claim that "all men are created equal" applies to...all men (and women, and children) on the entire planet!  If the latter is true, then we have a duty under the constitution to make sure that all men are free all over the world.  But this is really not the goal of liberals, because they really don't like to get involved in foreign conflicts, even when those conflicts directly affect our nation.  They are not interested in seeing all men made equal under our constitution.  Rather, their interest is in weakening our constitution so it's not so much of a threat to countries ruled by evil men.  If we make nice with them, the theory goes, they will have no reason to be mean to us.

I don't know if liberals are truly ignorant of the purpose of our constitution (which would be the nicer answer), or that they are blatantly opposed to it.  And I'm not talking about your average run-of-the-mill do-gooder liberal.  I'm talking about those who's job it is to stand in Congress and rape Americans of their hard-earned money to line their pockets and call our troops names - those very same troops who are right now giving their lives so these people can continue to go on their rants about how "evil" the American "empire" is, and how "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."  It is this liberal ideal of moral equivalence that was behind the 5-4 decision to grant terrorists constitutional rights.

But it's this same idea of moral equivalence that propelled the California Supreme Court to rule in favor of sodomites everywhere, claiming that they have a constitutional right to marriage.  I use the word "sodomite" on purpose, because there is a long history of this kind of activity, reaching a sort of climax in the town of Sodom, an ancient city on the banks of the Mediterranean Sea, that was completely given to acts of homosexuality.  If one reads the account as given in the Bible, one will notice that the entire town, and everyone in it, was engaged in this activity.  When two male strangers entered the home of one of the town leaders, the entire town turns out that night to hold a party in their favor, to initiate them to the ways of the town.

Everyone - men, women, and children, were turned into "sodomites."  The goal of the true "sodomite" is to make everyone like themselves.  They don't just want equality with heterosexual men - they want to subvert the latter.  While I'm not going to say that all sodomites prey on young men and boys, it is true that many of them do.  Just look at what happened with the Catholic church in recent history.  How is it that all these supposedly "godly" men, who grew up wanting to become priests and do the work of God, could become so perverted as to prey on the most innocent among us?  I believe it is because these same priests were turned in the same way they sought to turn other young boys.  This activity is self-perpetuating.  So in ruling that Sodomites can marry each other, they pave the way for yet more sodomites to be "born", and eventually they will overtake the natural order of things.  This is not a fear; it is a fact based on history, both recent and ancient.

The question is how far we will let the courts go before we decide to take action to limit them.  These people who deem it their duty to single-handedly change the constitution should be held in contempt of the people, and thrown out of their black robes.  They should be in jail, not sitting on benches taking salaries from honest tax-paying people.  I sincerely believe we are headed for a constitutional crisis, brought to us by judges.  Previous crisis's were the result of bad policies enacted by Congress, or by a failure to act, but this next one will come from the honored men in black.  What will be the catalyst?  I don't know.  I only know that at some point, the American people will rise up as one and decide we can no longer live under their rule.  We want our country back!  The only question is how many more of our rights will we lose before that fateful day comes?